Category Archives: Women’s Issues

What Women Want…in Female Protagonists

Today I like: Getting back on the horse
Not so much: Headaches

I’m about to sound off on one of the great conundrums of our times….not healthcare reform…not Afghanistan….not gay marriage. I mean the Katniss/Bella debate.

Full disclosure: I’m coming at this from a skewed viewpoint. I love me some Katniss…do not love Bella, because Bella does not have many redeeming qualities. Of course, there’s the argument that Bella’s appeal is in her banality. She’s living the dream of every shy, plain Jane high school girl (or grown woman) who hoped the most unattainable boy in school would just open his eyes. See her as special…beautiful…wonderful. And let’s not forget about the second most attractive boy in school…two hot guys fighting over one average girl! Yes, I get the appeal…but I think as writers we have a responsibility to give our readers something to aspire to while we entertain.

That’s why I love Katniss…she’s a near perfect protagonist for the modern girl (or woman…like Twilight, The Hunger Games defies an age-specific audience) to emulate. She’s tough and smart and she’s a survivor. At the same time, she’s flawed in very believable ways. Being a survivor lends itself to selfishness and manipulation. There were times Katniss really got under my skin. The way she treated Peeta made me want to climb into the book and slap her around a bit.

I’ve talked a lot about flawed characters (see my posts on the Prince Charming archetype and my seemingly nonsensical love of Eminem). The Bella/Katniss debate gave me some new insight into crafting balanced personalities.  It all goes back to forcing the reader to like someone despite the person’s inherent flaws…and much of that can be summed up in one word: Respect.

I respect Katniss, even if she can be a selfish bitch at times. Bella, on the other hand, is not a character that commands respect, either from the reader or her fellow characters.

So this brings me to the question, what do women really want in their fictional female role models? My favorites, Elizabeth Bennett and Scarlett O’Hara, are more in line with Katniss than Bella…but I’m sure many a novel has ridden the road to success on the train of a more simpering gown. I guess I just can’t remember any that I enjoyed…

And what about us, ladies? Do we emulate Bella or Katniss in our real lives? And which archetype is more appealing to men?

I’ve been conducting an admittedly unscientific poll of those of the male persuasion…what attracts you to a woman? Overwhelmingly they came back at me with some version of confidence/independence/comfortable with herself (a nice butt seemed to be up there, too, but that’s another post).

This seems more in line with Katniss than Bella…yet still the Bella ideal lingers in our collective female consciousness. Maybe it just takes less effort to be a Bella, to sit back and let the guys do all the work and be worshipped for mediocrity. I have two girls, however, and I’m going to steer them in the Katniss direction. We all have our flaws, but if I can help it, they’ll be the rescuers…not the rescued.

Desperate Housedog

Today I like: Lululemon
Not so much: Leftover Halloween candy. Ugh.

We have a dog. Rosie. She’s a Rhodesian Ridgeback. If you’re not familiar with Ridgebacks, let me describe the breed: Large. Brown. Floppy ears. Stripe of hair that grows backwards along the spine. Bred to hunt lions and protect homesteads in southern Africa. Loyal and protective. Lovely animals.

That being said, Rosie is driving me mad. She paces the house all day long on a scavenging mission. She knows how to open the drawer wherein hides the ever tempting trashcan. She’s approximately six feet tall when she stands on her hind legs, so she can reach any food item on the counter, from toast crumbs to birthday cakes. She stalks the kids and takes whatever they happen to have in their hands. She goes outside and swipes McDonald’s bags from the poor construction workers building the house next door.

And then, after gorging herself on anything she can find, she stands at the pantry door and whines for food.

“For the love of God,” I say. “You’re not hungry. You just ate an entire rotisserie chicken. Bones and all.”

Rosie: “Mee…meee…eee…errr…errr.”

Me: “No! What about the bag of Hershey kisses? All that tin foil must have been filling.”

She does not hear me. Nor does her stomach, which I assume is lined with South African conflict diamonds or something, since nothing she swallows seems to have one iota of negative effect. (I used to panic when she ate something suspect. Several pricy, pointless trips to the vet later, I just shrug.) I can never send a picture of her to the breeder, who once sent me an email with the tagline: “Is your Ridgeback fit or fat?”

If she got one look at Rosie’s spare tire she’d demand we return her. I guess I could send a head shot, but her cheeks are a bit round, too.

The thing is, I sort of understand why Rosie has OCD. She’s bored. This is my fault. Between three kids, a house, and writing, I don’t take the time to play ball with her or walk her every day or even pet her half the time. She’s looking for something to do. Food is her obsession.

I used to be a dog person. I swear. I had a dachshund named Schnapps, and I had a total blind spot for that little guy. My college roommates hated him, and with good reason, since he barked non-stop and would bite your fingers off if you tried to drag him out from under the bed. (“That dog is the devil.” –Lindsey, circa 1997). I wouldn’t hear a word against him and took him everywhere with me.

At this point, however, poor Rosie is pretty low on the totem pole. At the same time, I understand her malaise. In the year or two before I started writing seriously, I became a bit obsessed with working out. Overdid it on several occasions, once leading to a stress fracture in my tibia that took six months to heal. I agonized over my inability to get out, get on it, get moving. I finally realized I was looking for something to occupy my mind, not necessarily my body. I loved being home with my kids, but as I emerged from six years of baby haze I knew I needed something else. I couldn’t cook and clean and cart kids, not without some additional mental stimulation. I was literally running myself into the ground in my search for some additional, personal purpose.

Once I began writing in earnest, The Cracked Slipper took shape quickly, and suddenly working out became enjoyable again. No more injuries. I’m still extremely active, but it’s a healthy habit.

So, I know Rosie needs mental stimulation, too. Something to take her mind off the trashcan and whatever tidbits might be lurking in it. My dog is struggling with a canine version of The Feminine Mystique. It’s guess it’s up to me to turn her into an enlightened, fulfilled doggy woman of the 21st century. She needs a career, or a hobby, or something. Any ideas?

Sympathizing with the Wicked Stepmother

Today I like: Half-hour naps.
Not so much: The movie HOP. It’s no Tangled. It’s not even Gnomeo and Juliet.

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking on the topic of sympathy and unlikeable characters, probably because so many of my characters are archetypal. Creating conflicting emotions toward such characters is vital, as they’re drawn in black and white in traditional stories. Fairytale heroine, Prince Charming, fairy godmother, big bad wolf, troll at the bridge. We all know what side each in on.

Today I’d like to tackle that most hated of fairytale culprits: the Wicked Stepmother. I’ll start by saying that, individual personality traits aside, the stepmother is an intrinsically sympathetic character.

I hear you already. Huh? That nasty woman who forced sweet Cinderella to mop and sew and then tried to sabotage her happily-ever-after when it came calling?

Yes, her. I’ll lump Snow White’s stepmother in with Cinderella’s, and I’ll vouch for other stereotypes of the cruel, calculating older woman. Here’s why.

In the case of female beauty, young is it, and always has been. Our most familiar fairytales emerged when a woman’s beauty was her most prized asset. Barring some fabulous wealth or family connections, it could be her only asset. Her worth was beyond her control, tied up in genetics, ease of life, and time itself.

In the case of Snow White’s stepmother, the prototypical “Evil Queen” who longs to be “the fairest of them all,” you have a woman holding onto the trait that has always defined her, even as it fades. In the face of such a threat, and with no other means of creating an identity or worth, she lashes out at the competition. Snow White becomes the victim of the Queen’s diminishing prestige.

Cinderella’s stepmother takes a similar track. In the most popular versions of this story, she’s twice a widow with two children to support. She may have lost the upward mobility of her own attractiveness, but she has her daughters. If they are to advance, the stepmother must also eliminate possible rivalries. Hence Cinderella gets the short end of the stick…or broom.

These woman are not nice. They’re vengeful, deceitful, and just plain cruel. But I still sympathize with them. In their existence, a narrow definition of physical beauty is the means to self worth (the admiration of men) and even physical security (marriage). Perhaps if Snow White’s evil queen were a conquering general or a famous artist she wouldn’t be so concerned with the opinion of the magic mirror. Maybe if Cinderella’s stepmother could send her daughters to Harvard she wouldn’t care if one of them nabbed the Prince.

The emphasis on youthful beauty and the relative powerlessness of these characters creates the conflict between fairytale heroines and their oppressors. This dynamic played out before earlier audiences in real life, most famously with the ousting of Katherine of Aragon for the younger, more “beautiful” and assumedly more fertile Anne Boleyn. Women of the time railed against Anne for myriad reasons, many of them religious, but predominantly because they sympathized with Katherine: the long-suffering wife, ousted because her husband wanted a newer, fancier model.

Fortunately for modern (Westernized) women, we have options. We can take care of ourselves, and unlike the Wicked Stepmother and her daughters, we don’t need marriage to Prince Charming to set us up for life. That doesn’t mean, however, that notions of what is and is not beautiful have changed, or that they don’t affect us.  If anything, the media barrage of slim, perky, pouty, pre-childbearing beauty is more in our faces than ever.

The attractiveness of men is not reliant on the blush of youth and the fickleness of fecundity. Power, wealth and prestige all contribute to a man’s supposed appeal, and these things tend to increase with age. We hear talk of “cougars,” but Demi-and-Ashton couples are still the exception to the rule. Many of us know a woman who’s husband left her for a much younger woman, and I have single friends in their thirties who bemoan the tendency of single thirty-something men to date much younger women. We don’t need marriage, but if you are so inclined, at some point in your life you may be one one or the other side of the Battle of the Ages.

I’m not talking about Waterloo, or a WWF cage match. I’m talking about beauty standards that pit women against one another based on age, and result in jealousies and resentment and way too many bad facelifts. The solution feels complicated, but on an individual level it’s simple. Value women at all stages of life, for their experiences and wisdom and the hard work their bodies have done in bearing burdens and bearing children. I’m convinced that if she’d had a strong sense of her own value, and the options we have today, the Wicked Stepmother wouldn’t have been so wicked. What do you think?

 

 

 

 

The Difference Between Us and Them

Today I like: My husband. This post is reminding me of how fortunate I am.
Not so much: Ridiculously expensive high-tech minivan tires

The ring is on my hand,
And the wreath is on my brow;
Satin and jewels grand
Are all at my command,
And I am happy now.

Excerpt from Bridal Ballad by Edgar Allan Poe (1837)

In The Cracked Slipper I examine  a fairytale marriage within the strict social confines of a pre-industrial, patriarchal society. When asked, I describe it as pseudo-renaissance, with Regency mannerisms. So, somewhere in the realm of 16th to 19th century Europe (add talking parrots and unicorns, remove men in wigs). As I’ve said before, I love historical fiction. I also believe in magic :) and have a background in Women’s Studies. I wanted to think about Cinderella in the same way I’ve thought about Anne Boleyn, Marie Antoinette and the Duchess of Devonshire.

How did these women feel about their lack of choices? Did they despair, or were the expectations set before them so ingrained as to be unquestionable? With marriage the one card in play, did it ever meet expectations?

In the days when that storied institution summed up all one’s hopes and dreams, I can only imagine a lot of very disappointed ladies. Marriages to men they hardly knew. Men who turned out to be too old, too drunk, too mean. Men who ignored them or beat them silly or slept with the kitchenmaid. The ring is on my hand…and I am happy now.

What did they do with their sadness? Not much. There was nothing to be done. I’m sure most of them prayed and did what was expected of them. I want to know how they felt about it all. Could Anne Boleyn have fathomed that the man who turned the world on its head out of love for her would kill her when she failed to deliver the much-desired male heir? I can’t ask Anne, but I can create a fairytale heroine beset with many of the above mentioned difficulties. I can get inside her head and live her hopes and frustration with her.

Women today don’t have to rely on love and marriage for our happiness, but that doesn’t mean some don’t anyway. Some still marry for financial security or emotional security. Some marry their first love, only to realize ten years later they should have shopped around a bit. On the other hand, everyone has a friend who “settled” because it seemed like it was time. We let our parents push us toward suitable partners.  A some point we’ve all ignored obvious incompatibilities…convinced ourselves that if we just stick it out, he’ll change. Domestic violence still plagues us. We carry the ghosts of our early years into our adult relationships.

The difference between us and them (meaning Anne, Georgiana and my own Cinderella, Eleanor) is that for the most part we make our own decisions, we live with them and learn from them, and we can get out. We can start over if we make a mistake. So in the end, I love my imaginary world, but I’m glad I don’t live in it.

In Defense of Barbie Flicks

Today I like: Long runs in cold weather
Not so much: Why, Why, Why can’t I stop biting my fingernails?

So today I’m thinking about Barbie movies. Why, you ask? Well, because I’m usually thinking about something very girlie (said movies) or something very not (Tonka Trucks, for example). We have all the standard Christmas movies on DVD. You’ve got your Rudolph, your Frosty, your Whos Down in Whoville. Kris Kringle, Charlie Brown and the Royal Ballet’s Nutcracker production. We have two newer gems, however, ones you never watched on NBC back in the day: Barbie in a Christmas Carol and Barbie in the Nutcracker.

Barbie! Eeek! The social scientist in me rebels. Tiny feet! Tiny waist! Tiny nose! Huge…well…you know. A twelve-inch reminder of every woman’s imperfections, forced upon us before we know the meaning of the word. Unattainable plastic and polyester glamour in a box. So why, then, do my girls watch Barbie movies with my support?

Because, frankly, Barbie kicks some butt in those movies. I challenge any mother to pre-screen Barbie and the Three Musketeers and find fault with the story. Yes, Barbie is pretty and blond and skinny. Yes, so are her friends. However, I prefer an attractive woman who solves her own problems to any woman who doesn’t.

The same moms who raise an eyebrow at my embrace of Barbie movies have no problem with Disney’s Cinderella or Snow White or Sleeping Beauty. Even the female animal characters in 101 Dalmations, Lady and the Tramp, and The Aristocats are milquetoast. I argue that the passive women (and dogs!) in those movies do our girls more of an injustice than Barbie and her size three feet. I’ve said it before (see my post on Disney’s Cinderella here), my girls watch the older Disney movies (except Snow White. We don’t have that one, because I just can’t take it on so many levels that reach beyond feminism and into the realm of “it’s-just-so-freakin’-annoying”). I balance them out, however, with the newer Disney films like Beauty and the Beast, Tinkerbell, and the lovely The Princess and the Frog. When we do watch the older movies, I talk with my girls about what they would have done had they been in the heroine’s position. It never involves sitting around waiting for rescue.

I would love Barbie to have a more realistic face and figure, but with our kids bombarded by an endless stream of entertainment, most of it at their fingertips (DVD? On-Demand? We saw Rudolph once a year!  We had to watch the commercials!) I take my positive messages where I find them. The Barbie movies not only portray smart, active heroines, they teach valuable lessons on friendship, honesty and being yourself. If yourself is a gorgeous blond, well, aren’t you lucky. Regardless, Barbie movies have redeeming value while being cute and glittery and fun in all the ways little girls love.

I do find one problem with certain Barbie movies. They elevate the female characters at the expense of the male (case in point, the Mermaidia series). Why can’t everyone kick butt? Why does Barbie have to rock out and Ken become a bumbling, muttering idiot? So I’ll let my girls watch them and not my son…it’s hard to win, I tell ya.

On that note, we all know parents need to talk about these things with their kids. Girl and boy power, body image, all of it. Most important, everyone recognizes the need to limit time in front of the rectangle on the wall. But to the girl moms out there: when you’re driving from DC to Detroit and you need a respite from AAAAbsolutely Mindy and Robbie Schaefer’s Stuck in a Real Tall Tree…when you can’t take any more fighting, Laurie Berkner or requests for Taylor Swift or B.O.B’s Magic…reach for a Barbie flick…you’ll be surprised. The Diamond Castle is my personal fav. It’s, like, so awesome.

Two Elizabeths

Today I like: Lizzy Bennett and Good Queen Bess
Not so much: planning my kids’ extracurricular activities. It requires more strategizing than Waterloo.

Here’s what I like to read: historical fiction. Philippa Gregory, Geraldine Brooks and Tracy Chevalier come to mind. I am also addicted to the original, Ms. Austen. I swoon over Mister Darcy as much as the next gal. Give me petticoats and tortured artists, castles and courts, mad composers and much jockeying up the social ladder. It always helps if there’s a royal mistress involved, and I’m a sucker for English accents. I watched The Tudors backward and forward, and I cried every time Anne Boleyn got the ax (er…sword). As if I didn’t know it was coming.

When it comes to historical fiction aimed at women, there’s an oft-used theme: smart, outspoken woman battles against her dubious past and the confines of patriarchy, set against a backdrop of courtly intrigue. I’m particularly fond of two ladies, both called Elizabeth, whose very different stories reflect this idea.

Let’s start with the original Elizabeth. That’s right, QE1. I’ve read at least ten versions of her life story. Fiction, non-fiction. Multiple viewings of Elizabeth and Elizabeth: The Golden Age and that one on HBO with Helen Mirren. I never tire of her, and it seems like no one else does, either.

Her obvious historical influence aside, why does Elizabeth so captivate us? I believe it’s because of the above-mentioned formula. Dubious upbringing? Check (that whole bastard thing). Oppressive male-dominated social system? Definitely. Highly educated, opinionated woman who proves all the naysayers wrong? Yes! Elizabeth has had women shouting “You go, girl!” (or maybe, “thou goest!”) for centuries.

My next Elizabeth, Miss Elizabeth Bennet, might not have graced any ballroom but the imaginary one at Netherfield, but as far as fiction goes, she’s a definite QE. Sassy, smart and hovering on the edge of the aristocracy. One of five daughters, never a fabulous position in a culture where men control the purse strings and a woman’s value lies in her ability to latch onto the one who stands to inherit the most. Lizzie isn’t the most beautiful or flirtatious Bennett sister, but she bucks the odds. Lizzie transforms the illustrious Mister Darcy (sigh) with her wit and character. Once again, women all over the world shout, “Hurray! We love you, Lizzie!” The publishing industry responds with dozens of P&P knock-offs. Yes, I’ve read a lot of those, too, although I’ve steered clear of the ones involving zombies.

So, if Liz the First and Lizzie the Second (Bennett sister) can do it, why not Cinderella? After the ball she’s bound to have the same problems…sketchy background…pesky patriarchal limitations. Let’s make her smart; let’s make her fiesty. Let’s see what she makes of it. Add a few dragons and unicorns, lots of fabulous parties, family feuds and a gossipy parrot, and voilà! The Cracked Slipper.

Steph

Cinderella: Of Mice and Meekness

Today I like: Carving pumpkins
Not so much: Fruit flies

There are so many fairytales out there– you’ve got Snow White and her vertically challenged friends, that narcoleptic chick, Rapunzel (hairy heroine) and Beauty (hairy hero). Pesky peas, frogs disguised as princes and princes disguised as paupers. So, it makes sense to ask…why did I choose to rewrite Cinderella?

Simple. Because Cinderella has become a part of our collective consciousness. It’s an idea that’s been burned into the feminine psyche: If only you’re kind, compliant and hardworking…someday it will all be…not just okay…wonderful. Wonderful forever.

The Cinderella story is a global tradition. One of the earliest recorded versions comes from China, circa 860AD. The tale of Ye Xian: a hardworking, beautiful young woman who befriends a fish. Unbeknownst to Ye Xian, the fish is the reincarnation of her mother. Why is her mother dead? Because Ye Xian’s nasty stepmother killed her! The fish helps her prepare for a festival, where she loses her shoe. The king uses the shoe to find her and, of course, he takes her for his bride.

The version of the tale most familiar to western audiences is that of Cendrillon, written by French author Charles Perrault in 1697. Perrault introduces the pumpkin coach, the animal assistants, the fairy godmother and the glass slippers. Perrault’s version is a bit more family friendly than Aschenputtel, the 19th century Cinderella story of the Brothers Grimm. Perrault’s Cinderella forgives her stepsisters and finds advantageous marriages for them. In the German rendition, pigeons peck out the eyes of both stepsisters. Grim, indeed.

These stories stretch from Russia to the Philippines, Vietnam to Scotland to Norway. Always with the same message: Things won’t always be like this. Just keep slogging away. Someday it will all be different. Be good, be good, and you’ll get your reward. Cinderella was forced on our great-grandmothers, our grandmothers, our mothers, ourselves, and now our daughters. We come to a low point in the 1950′s, when Disney’s Cinderella becomes so helpless and compliant that she must rely on mice to save her. Mice. At least give me a hot cartoon guy in tights, Walt. I mean, mice?

I have two young daughters. They drink the Disney Princess Kool-aid just like all little girls. (I swear whoever came up with the idea to package the Disney Princesses is a genuis…a feminist’s nightmare…but a genius just the same.) They worship at the alter of Bippity-Boppity-Boo. I cringed as they watched that movie. Yet I am guilty. I let them watch it. Why? Because, deep down, we all sort of love Cinderella. Most of us have felt a bit like her at times…outcast, overworked, lonely. Just wanting a happy ending.

So I decided to make her real. For the women my daughters will become, and for women who carry her story long past childhood. A real woman: brave, smart and opinionated…but at times insecure, naive, and stupidly romantic. A girl we can all relate to…in a fairytale world. That’s The Cracked Slipper.

Next time…more about The Cracked Slipper…and that lovely (absurd) idea…happily ever after.

Steph