Category Archives: The Cracked Slipper

Here’s where to get The Cracked Slipper!

Yippee! The Cracked Slipper is out in the world. Here’s where to get it.

For Kindle and in paperback at Amazon.com
For Nook at BarnesAndNoble.com
For iPad and iPhone and everything else at Smashwords.com

Thanks so much to everyone who has helped along the way. I hope you enjoy the story as much as I have enjoyed living it in my imagination.
Please get in touch about book club events! I’m all about book club chat…and wine if your club is so inclined. :)
xo,
Steph
Oh, and here’s a photo that clearly illustrates my emotions today!
The Cracked Slipper Stephanie Alexander

The Cracked Slipper is almost here!

"Stephanie Alexander Rehmann" "The Cracked Slipper" "Stephanie Alexander"

I’m so excited to reveal the cover of The Cracked Slipper! Yippee!

The Cracked Slipper will be available SOON on Amazon.com, BarnesAndNoble.com, and Smashwords.com.

More coming this week…thanks to everyone who has been so supportive…and thank you for the patience of those who have been waiting to read it.

Special thanks to Nikki Hensley for the fabulous cover and to my agent Rebecca Friedman for being forward thinking, butt-kicking, and generally a great friend.

xo
Steph :)

 

I’ve Been Afraid of Changin’

Today I like: School uniforms
Not so much: Paying for them! Wow, pricy.

This is my first post since my family officially relocated to Charleston, South Carolina, home of my alma mater, C of C. Anyone who’s read this blog knows of my undying love for this city, and if you’re so inclined you can see check out this post on the reasons for my devotion. I’ve dreamed of getting back here, permanently, for about five years. Somehow, within the span of roughly three months, that notion went from daydream to reality. So naturally, I’m thrilled.

I’ll admit, however, that when the move first looked like it might really happen, I panicked. Second thoughts swamped me. We had a nice house. Tons of friends. The kids were settled in school and loved our community. My mom lived a few towns over.

I loved Charleston, but did I want to rock this little boat? Send it down a creek we’ve not yet navigated?

Friends asked us why we were moving, and I struggled for a reason that would sound practical. We weren’t moving for my husband’s job, or my job (Hello! As a yet unpaid novelist…I can do that pretty much anywhere). We don’t have family in Charleston. I came up with this vague reasoning…quality of life. Hmm…clear as pluff mud, I know.

The logistics were daunting, from packing to gathering umpteen financial documents, from sorting out new schools to getting our DC house ready to sell…not to mention keeping it in show-able shape at all times with three kids home for the summer. In the meantime I was working on a rewrite for my agent…putting the final touches on The Cracked Slipper in preparation for submission.

It felt like too much. As much as I wanted to get back to Charleston, a little voice in my head kept up a running commentary. The voice sounded sort of like Steve Buscemi playing Nucky Thompson on Boardwalk Empire. Minus copious amounts of bootleg gin and hip retro Prohibition suits.

“Too much…too much. Let’s just keep comfortable. We have a swell setup here.”

In the end I told Steve to shut his pie hole and dug in. And once I got going, it wasn’t so bad. Focus, time. Move from one thing to the next and check the box. It all fell into place, and started to feel good. Driving over the Cooper River Bridge this morning, I had this thought: “Thank God. I’m home. What took me so long?”

I couldn’t help but compare my pre-move jitters to similar feelings I’ve had throughout the process of writing and (hopefully!) publishing The Cracked Slipper. Last summer a published novelist read my manuscript, and while she loved the characters and the voice, she presented me with a seemingly insurmountable point-of-view challenge.

She suggested I rewrite the entire MS, at the time written in a multiple closed third person POV. She wanted a single POV. She even suggested first person.

My first thought: “No freakin’ way. I can’t! I know this story backwards and forwards! I can recite it by heart! I love some of those scenes!”

Case in point, I was comfortable with the story as it was.

But Steve started in again. This time, he was right. “C’mon, kid. It’s good now. It’s a real hum dinger. But it could be great.”

And I saw the problems…my multiple POV’s diluted the plot, and in turn un-empowered my protagonist. I knew I had to take the advice. So I took a deep breath and, yup, I dug in. In the end I chose to keep the third person, and tell the story from the perspectives of both my heroine and her love interest, but it was still a massive effort. I slogged it out over six sweltering August weeks.

Just like with the move, once I got my head around what I needed to do it started flowing. It all came together, and even as I wrote it I could see the story getting stronger with each revision, new scene, and yes…even deletion of that beloved old material.

Once I finished I reread the entire novel. “Thank God I listened to her,” I thought. “Why didn’t I do this before?”

So, that’s my lesson for today. Get beyond comfortable, in life and writing. Dive in and make the change happen. Don’t settle for the okay, when you can have fabulous with a bit of effort. I’m guessing you’ll wonder why it took you so long.

From Prince Charming to Shrek (and in between)

Today I like: Tot Soccer
Not so much: Tot up three times in one night. Tired!

So I’ve talked a lot about female protagonists in traditional fairytales. The passivity, the lack of depth, the focus on the physical, all that stuff. I have two daughters, so that makes sense, but lately I’ve been thinking about male characters. I have a son, too. What message does the Prince Charming archetype send him? How has this image evolved, for the good and the bad, in the male characters popular culture puts in front of our boys?

I’m going to focus on movies, for two reasons. One, because at three my son’s reading habits don’t go much past Green Eggs and Ham. Two, because I’m always trying to buy an hour of entertainment while I make dinner/clean up/do homework with the big kids. In a few years we’ll talk Diary of a Wimpy Kid/Harry Potter/Lord of the Flies, but for now I’m sticking with the not-so-lofty.

All animation roads seem to begin with Disney, and Prince Charming is the original Superman. Handsome, strong, and…well, that’s about it. I’d argue that while he’s more active than the Princess archetype, he doesn’t have much to recommend him beyond the physical. He gets his girl, not by being intelligent or kind or interesting, but by kissing her or kicking some butt (or maybe just finding her shoe, in my personal fav). Speaking of superheroes, Superman is not much better off. He rarely has to do much in the way of thinking (unlike Lex Luther, who’s so much more interesting!).

What does my son learn from these fantasy role models? I know what he does NOT learn. He does not learn to value his own intelligence or the intelligence of women. He does not learn that mind matters over muscle. He does not learn that a lot more goes into getting the girl (and keeping her!) than good looks.

In more recent movies, I’ve noticed a swing in the opposite direction, and I have a theory. A lot of formerly skinny, wimpy guys have become wildly successful CGI animators. They want to give the little dude the spotlight (thumbs up!). They also hope to appeal to mothers who want stronger female characters. So we end up with the “bumbling idiot” example of maleness. I’ve seen this guy in recent Barbie movies. I’ve defended these movies for my girls, but I have one big problem with them. Why, in order for Barbie to kick butt, must Ken become a stuttering fool? I cringed a bit for my son watching Rio and even The Princess and the Frog, where Rio the parrot is a sorry mama’s boy and Price Naveen is a shallow, philandering playboy. The female characters in these movies, ironically, completely dominate the male.

Fortunately, unlike the old Prince Charming/Superman characters, Rio and Prince Naveen are fluid characters. They’re good guys in the end. They grow and mature and make the right decisions. A huge improvement over the stilted, sword-wielding prince of Disney’s Sleeping Beauty. Still, I’d love to see more movies present a unified vision: a smart man and a smart woman solving problems together.

So that’s why I’ve embraced Shrek. Don’t get me wrong, the gross-out humor and gratuitous Eddie Murphy ham-fests get old. However, the Shrek movies do what few other kids’ films manage to do. Shrek and Fiona are intelligent, strong characters that love and stick by each other. Oh, and of course there’s the fact that they are both chunky, green ogres. Bodily functions aside, Shrek is pretty good stuff for the mixed-gender, under ten set.

I’m always searching for positive entertainment for my kids. Stuff that they actually want to watch. It’s a mixed bag…some good here…a bit of uh, oh, there.  I expected to find movies that would harm my daughter’s image of womanhood. I find it surprising, however, that I need to look out for my little guy’s sense of self, too.

What are some of your favorite kids’ movies? Any you remember from your own childhood– good or bad? If you’re a parent, is there one movie you’d just NEVER let your kids watch? (For me– Disney’s Snow White. The ultimate passive, pitiful heroine and cardboard, pointless prince.)

 

 

Tell me: I shouldn’t like you…but I do

Today I like: Gregory Desmarais
Not so much: Gregory Desmarais

Some of you know Gregory, some of you don’t. If you haven’t been a Cracked Slipper guinea pig, let me fill you in. Gregory is my alcoholic Prince Charming. An interesting number of readers ask me the same question about him: “Am I supposed to like Gregory or not?”

I love this question! It means I’m doing my job. When you’re dealing with a character as archetypal as Cinderella’s handsome prince there’s a lot of pressure involved. Obviously, Gregory was not going to be the be-all-and-end-all of our five year-old dreams. On the other hand, I didn’t want to make him the complete opposite of the ideal. That would have been too predictable, and too easy. If my readers aren’t sure whether I want them to like Gregory or not, perfect!

Every writer knows our heroines/ heroes are supposed to be flawed. I’d argue that a lot of stories take the easy route by giving characters attributes disguised as flaws (the reckless spy is really just super-duper brave) or shallow flows (twenty-something gal buys too many shoes, runs up credit card, soooo irresponsible). Regardless, it’s not so hard to find flaws in characters who are, for the most part, appealing. It’s much harder to make the reader grudgingly root for someone who really doesn’t deserve it.

The first time I noticed this I was about ten-ish, and reading IT by Stephen King (yes, we all know I love Steve). Anyway, there is this kid in the story. Henry Bowers. Bully and all around fifth grade a***ole. Not a profound thought inside his thick, buzzcut-bedecked skull. Beats up on Bill, Richie, and poor fat Ben Hanscom. Not a redeeming thing about him.

However, even at ten I remember wanting Henry to come around. Really wanting it. In the case of this particular character, I think it had to do with a very sympathetic backstory (Runaway or dead mother, I can’t remember which. Crazy, abusive WWII vet father). I knew poor Henry never really had a chance. He couldn’t help what he was. So I felt sorry for him. I sort of…liked him.

I also felt this way about brilliant, charming Hannibal Lecter of The Silence of the Lambs. Maybe Hannibal really liked Clarice. Maybe she’d be the one person he wouldn’t try to eat, and even if he did, the guy was cool anyway. Eww, a cool cannibal?

On the film front, I love the HBO show Big Love. The acting is great, of course, but more than that I respect any TV show that can make feminist moi side with a bunch of fundamentalist polygamists. They’re consenting adults. Can’t we just let them live? Did I just write that?

So you get what I’m saying. I love Gregory, because I know him inside and out. But I want you to love him, too! Or maybe…sort of…do I?

Tell me…what character pulls you in two different directions?

My Long Love Affair

Today I like: elementary school bingo night
Not so much: sprained ankle…grrr….

The last person to read The Cracked Slipper asked me this question: “Why unicorns?”

It caught me a bit off guard. “Uh, well…”

“You just like them?”

“Yeah, I guess I do,” I said. “I’ve always been a sort of…horsey person.”

So this got me thinking about my long love affair with all things neighing. It started between three and four, when I convinced my mother I was crazy. I would gallop around our townhouse on my hands and knees, from the kitchen to the dining room to the living room. Back down the hall and into the kitchen again. I wore out the knees in my ribbed tights and my Osh Kosh B’gosh overalls. I neighed when my mother introduced me to people.

She took me to the doctor. “There is something wrong with her,” she said.

“Hello, Stephanie,” said Dr. Ortega.

“Neeee! Snort, snort.”

“See?” said my mother. “She’s had a break with reality.”

Dr. Ortega shook his head. “She just has a wild imagination. She’ll grow out of it.”

Thankfully I learned to shake hands, not hooves, before entering kindergarten. I also learned to put my imagination on paper. I started drawing horses. All the time, horses, horses, horses. All the stories I’d been telling on my gallops through the townhouse came to life on the pages in front of me. I’m sure they weren’t very coherent to the casual observer at the time, but it was all crystal clear to me.

Around this time my mother took me to see The Last Unicorn in the movie theater. The Red Bull scared the pants off her, but I was hooked. I can still sing all those America songs by heart. Japanamation dominated by artistic endeavors for the next few years. Horses, horses, horses grew horns and feathered hooves, tasseled tails and big blue eyes. Now my stories could go anywhere. Girl meets unicorn = magic.

Around age ten I started writing stories to go with my pictures. I published these fabulous tales under the sadly defunct imprint of Steph Books, Incorporated (I always included a copyright date, savvy author that I was). A few of of these rare works survive. Unfortunately, the unicorn ones have long disintegrated, but you can still see my girl-loves-horse theme in the non-magical ones. Here’s the opening of one such classic: Ocean: The Story of a Steeplechaser (copyright 1988).

“Stacy sighed. It wasn’t fair. Today, all the horses, except Ocean, had been shipped to the horse show. (She worked for Mr. Kranford, who owned the farm, in exchange for lessons). She had wanted badly to go but Mr. Kranford wanted her to babysit. BABYSIT! On horse show day. She watched Ocean trot around the corral. She wished she had a horse like Ocean. She thought Ocean was the most Beautiful horse in the world.”

Guess who really wanted a horse and hated babysitting?

Here’s a picture from Sea Gull (circa 1987)…where Carrie and her horse brave a rockslide and make it home in time for pizza. (By the way, I was plotting even then. You can see where I erased my little notes to myself at the bottom of the page. This one says Rocks.)

I moved on…but you might notice the trend…sometime in high school…

HS

and then here’s one from right after college…

and how about this one I drew a few years back while my girls were coloring….probably a year before I came up with the idea for The Cracked Slipper.

So, it seems I was destined to write about a girl and her unicorn. Some loves follow you. The little girl is still in there, I guess. She doesn’t neigh at the neighbors (although she does play a mean game of Mommy-is-the-horsie), but she still has a wild imagination.

The Difference Between Us and Them

Today I like: My husband. This post is reminding me of how fortunate I am.
Not so much: Ridiculously expensive high-tech minivan tires

The ring is on my hand,
And the wreath is on my brow;
Satin and jewels grand
Are all at my command,
And I am happy now.

Excerpt from Bridal Ballad by Edgar Allan Poe (1837)

In The Cracked Slipper I examine  a fairytale marriage within the strict social confines of a pre-industrial, patriarchal society. When asked, I describe it as pseudo-renaissance, with Regency mannerisms. So, somewhere in the realm of 16th to 19th century Europe (add talking parrots and unicorns, remove men in wigs). As I’ve said before, I love historical fiction. I also believe in magic :) and have a background in Women’s Studies. I wanted to think about Cinderella in the same way I’ve thought about Anne Boleyn, Marie Antoinette and the Duchess of Devonshire.

How did these women feel about their lack of choices? Did they despair, or were the expectations set before them so ingrained as to be unquestionable? With marriage the one card in play, did it ever meet expectations?

In the days when that storied institution summed up all one’s hopes and dreams, I can only imagine a lot of very disappointed ladies. Marriages to men they hardly knew. Men who turned out to be too old, too drunk, too mean. Men who ignored them or beat them silly or slept with the kitchenmaid. The ring is on my hand…and I am happy now.

What did they do with their sadness? Not much. There was nothing to be done. I’m sure most of them prayed and did what was expected of them. I want to know how they felt about it all. Could Anne Boleyn have fathomed that the man who turned the world on its head out of love for her would kill her when she failed to deliver the much-desired male heir? I can’t ask Anne, but I can create a fairytale heroine beset with many of the above mentioned difficulties. I can get inside her head and live her hopes and frustration with her.

Women today don’t have to rely on love and marriage for our happiness, but that doesn’t mean some don’t anyway. Some still marry for financial security or emotional security. Some marry their first love, only to realize ten years later they should have shopped around a bit. On the other hand, everyone has a friend who “settled” because it seemed like it was time. We let our parents push us toward suitable partners.  A some point we’ve all ignored obvious incompatibilities…convinced ourselves that if we just stick it out, he’ll change. Domestic violence still plagues us. We carry the ghosts of our early years into our adult relationships.

The difference between us and them (meaning Anne, Georgiana and my own Cinderella, Eleanor) is that for the most part we make our own decisions, we live with them and learn from them, and we can get out. We can start over if we make a mistake. So in the end, I love my imaginary world, but I’m glad I don’t live in it.

In Defense of Barbie Flicks

Today I like: Long runs in cold weather
Not so much: Why, Why, Why can’t I stop biting my fingernails?

So today I’m thinking about Barbie movies. Why, you ask? Well, because I’m usually thinking about something very girlie (said movies) or something very not (Tonka Trucks, for example). We have all the standard Christmas movies on DVD. You’ve got your Rudolph, your Frosty, your Whos Down in Whoville. Kris Kringle, Charlie Brown and the Royal Ballet’s Nutcracker production. We have two newer gems, however, ones you never watched on NBC back in the day: Barbie in a Christmas Carol and Barbie in the Nutcracker.

Barbie! Eeek! The social scientist in me rebels. Tiny feet! Tiny waist! Tiny nose! Huge…well…you know. A twelve-inch reminder of every woman’s imperfections, forced upon us before we know the meaning of the word. Unattainable plastic and polyester glamour in a box. So why, then, do my girls watch Barbie movies with my support?

Because, frankly, Barbie kicks some butt in those movies. I challenge any mother to pre-screen Barbie and the Three Musketeers and find fault with the story. Yes, Barbie is pretty and blond and skinny. Yes, so are her friends. However, I prefer an attractive woman who solves her own problems to any woman who doesn’t.

The same moms who raise an eyebrow at my embrace of Barbie movies have no problem with Disney’s Cinderella or Snow White or Sleeping Beauty. Even the female animal characters in 101 Dalmations, Lady and the Tramp, and The Aristocats are milquetoast. I argue that the passive women (and dogs!) in those movies do our girls more of an injustice than Barbie and her size three feet. I’ve said it before (see my post on Disney’s Cinderella here), my girls watch the older Disney movies (except Snow White. We don’t have that one, because I just can’t take it on so many levels that reach beyond feminism and into the realm of “it’s-just-so-freakin’-annoying”). I balance them out, however, with the newer Disney films like Beauty and the Beast, Tinkerbell, and the lovely The Princess and the Frog. When we do watch the older movies, I talk with my girls about what they would have done had they been in the heroine’s position. It never involves sitting around waiting for rescue.

I would love Barbie to have a more realistic face and figure, but with our kids bombarded by an endless stream of entertainment, most of it at their fingertips (DVD? On-Demand? We saw Rudolph once a year!  We had to watch the commercials!) I take my positive messages where I find them. The Barbie movies not only portray smart, active heroines, they teach valuable lessons on friendship, honesty and being yourself. If yourself is a gorgeous blond, well, aren’t you lucky. Regardless, Barbie movies have redeeming value while being cute and glittery and fun in all the ways little girls love.

I do find one problem with certain Barbie movies. They elevate the female characters at the expense of the male (case in point, the Mermaidia series). Why can’t everyone kick butt? Why does Barbie have to rock out and Ken become a bumbling, muttering idiot? So I’ll let my girls watch them and not my son…it’s hard to win, I tell ya.

On that note, we all know parents need to talk about these things with their kids. Girl and boy power, body image, all of it. Most important, everyone recognizes the need to limit time in front of the rectangle on the wall. But to the girl moms out there: when you’re driving from DC to Detroit and you need a respite from AAAAbsolutely Mindy and Robbie Schaefer’s Stuck in a Real Tall Tree…when you can’t take any more fighting, Laurie Berkner or requests for Taylor Swift or B.O.B’s Magic…reach for a Barbie flick…you’ll be surprised. The Diamond Castle is my personal fav. It’s, like, so awesome.

My Writing Weirdness

Today I like: Running
Not so much: Chocolate addiction

I think it goes without saying that most writers are a little eccentric. Who hasn’t read a Stephen King novel and thought, What kind of guy comes up with this stuff? And so MUCH of it. READ: If ever the amazing and much-longed-for day arrives when I meet Mr. King, the man who has been making my imagination run wild since I picked up IT at age nine or so (WHAT was my mother thinking??), I will write a lengthy blog post on his weirdness (or lack thereof). Anyway, as I was saying, I would argue writers run the gamut from quirky to flat-out weird. Maybe our eccentricities are directly correlated to the kind of stories we produce. For example, writers of chick-lit and spy thrillers are a teensy bit weird, while writers of fantasy (like myself!) are way more whacked out.

That’s not to say we can’t fake it! Writers aren’t all reclusive geeks who spend so much time hunched over their keyboards and notebooks that their skin becomes translucent and they develop osteoporosis from lack of sunlight/Vitamin D. We do crave human companionship (I mean real humans, not just our characters). Lots of my readers have said they never would have guessed I had such a “wild imagination.” I take it as a compliment! I am passing as a normal, hip, thirty-something minivan drivin’ mom, when I am a closet believer in unicorns, dragons, and magic in general.

So I decided to reveal some of my particular writing habits, so you can see how weird I really am. This will be mildly embarrassing.

I’ve been telling myself “stories” for as long as I can remember. In my head. All the time. It began around age five as a way to help my little self fall asleep. I never grew out of it. Unicorns and fairies eventually morphed into high school crushes and imagined professional  and academic glory. I wrote scores of these stories down as a kid (with fabulous, true-to-life illustrations!) and wrote two novels between the ages of twelve and fourteen. I STILL tell myself stories all the time. My life is a running novella in my own head. Unbeknownst to my younger self, my personal melodrama came in very handy when the time came to sit down and start writing a real book. After all, I’d been crafting scenes and dialogue in my own head for twenty-plus years.

Moving on to my Ipod. It’s chock-full of playlists related to The Cracked Slipper. Action playlists. Romantic playlists. Thoughtful, introspective playlists. I have literally teared up imagining how my characters would feel about a certain song. I spend tons of time in the car, and it helps me stay connected to the writing process. Any song I hear on the radio, I think, How would Eleanor feel about this song? What about Dorian? Gregory? I’ve learned a lot about my characters this way. So if you pass me on the road and I look elated/depressed/angry, it’s probably not a lotto win/death in the family/road rage. I’m just having fun in an imaginary friend’s head.

So there they are! Two of my weirder writing habits. There are lots more (plotting during spinning classes! writing enough pages of world description to fill several longish Wikipedia entries!) but I’ll stop for for now. I write about asexual magicians plotting to take over the world, dragons who dominate international economic systems, and gossipy parrots. Weirdness inspired by weirdness. I’ll ask any of my writing buddies to be brave and reveal their OWN writing eccentricities.

Two Elizabeths

Today I like: Lizzy Bennett and Good Queen Bess
Not so much: planning my kids’ extracurricular activities. It requires more strategizing than Waterloo.

Here’s what I like to read: historical fiction. Philippa Gregory, Geraldine Brooks and Tracy Chevalier come to mind. I am also addicted to the original, Ms. Austen. I swoon over Mister Darcy as much as the next gal. Give me petticoats and tortured artists, castles and courts, mad composers and much jockeying up the social ladder. It always helps if there’s a royal mistress involved, and I’m a sucker for English accents. I watched The Tudors backward and forward, and I cried every time Anne Boleyn got the ax (er…sword). As if I didn’t know it was coming.

When it comes to historical fiction aimed at women, there’s an oft-used theme: smart, outspoken woman battles against her dubious past and the confines of patriarchy, set against a backdrop of courtly intrigue. I’m particularly fond of two ladies, both called Elizabeth, whose very different stories reflect this idea.

Let’s start with the original Elizabeth. That’s right, QE1. I’ve read at least ten versions of her life story. Fiction, non-fiction. Multiple viewings of Elizabeth and Elizabeth: The Golden Age and that one on HBO with Helen Mirren. I never tire of her, and it seems like no one else does, either.

Her obvious historical influence aside, why does Elizabeth so captivate us? I believe it’s because of the above-mentioned formula. Dubious upbringing? Check (that whole bastard thing). Oppressive male-dominated social system? Definitely. Highly educated, opinionated woman who proves all the naysayers wrong? Yes! Elizabeth has had women shouting “You go, girl!” (or maybe, “thou goest!”) for centuries.

My next Elizabeth, Miss Elizabeth Bennet, might not have graced any ballroom but the imaginary one at Netherfield, but as far as fiction goes, she’s a definite QE. Sassy, smart and hovering on the edge of the aristocracy. One of five daughters, never a fabulous position in a culture where men control the purse strings and a woman’s value lies in her ability to latch onto the one who stands to inherit the most. Lizzie isn’t the most beautiful or flirtatious Bennett sister, but she bucks the odds. Lizzie transforms the illustrious Mister Darcy (sigh) with her wit and character. Once again, women all over the world shout, “Hurray! We love you, Lizzie!” The publishing industry responds with dozens of P&P knock-offs. Yes, I’ve read a lot of those, too, although I’ve steered clear of the ones involving zombies.

So, if Liz the First and Lizzie the Second (Bennett sister) can do it, why not Cinderella? After the ball she’s bound to have the same problems…sketchy background…pesky patriarchal limitations. Let’s make her smart; let’s make her fiesty. Let’s see what she makes of it. Add a few dragons and unicorns, lots of fabulous parties, family feuds and a gossipy parrot, and voilà! The Cracked Slipper.

Steph